To this day, I continue to think that way. For example, I spend very little time comparing my company and my personal progress to others. It’s not about me (or us) relative to others. It is always about us, relative to who we are, to the opportunities that present themselves to us.
I think that is an important distinction. My standards and goals were always internally derived, and never defined in terms of other people.
Here’s another thought. To be the “best” connotes a fixed
position. When you are “the best” you have arrived. The race has been won; the prize achieved. I have never thought in those terms. To me, it has always been a continuous, never-ending process. I am certainly not the best that I can be, not by a long shot. My company has not “arrived,” nor will we ever. We continually strive, however, to become ever better. The focus is on the journey and the process, not the end.
One more thought. While the concept of becoming the “best that you can be” may make sense in a general, long-range, lifelong perspective, I have always found my motivation to be more urgent and within reach. In other words, while I could understand and assent to the general rule to “become the best that I could
be”, what motivated me on a day-to-day basis, and still motivates me, are the immediate opportunities and challenges. In a practical sense, I have not been motivated to “be the best that I could be in my life,” rather I have been motivated to do the best with the opportunity and situation which I see in front of me.
Since your
question really speaks to core motivation, I feel compelled to share that with you. We both realize that this... READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE