Q. We are intent on revising our decades-old sales force compensation plan. Management is divided. One half favors straight commission, and the other doesn’t. What are your thoughts?
A. In my work as a sales consultant, I am routinely involved in helping my clients revise their sales compensation plans. My company, on almost any day of the week, has an open compensation plan project that we are working on for a client.
Experience Matters
I say that to let you know that I have extensive experience with sales force compensation plans. The ideas which I am going to share with you arise out of this extensive experience.
In my career as a salesperson, I loved straight commission and eventually came to the position that I wouldn’t work on any other plan. In my experience as a sales consultant, I’ve changed my opinion.
In most circumstances, I don’t recommend straight commission plans.
Let’s make sure we are using the same language. I use the term straight commission to mean the kind of compensation that pays the salesperson only for making a sale. The salesperson receives no salary or wage other than commissions. Frequently the commission is a fixed percentage of the gross profit received on the sale.
Four Reasons Straight Commission Doesn’t Work
There are a number of reasons why I have evolved to this point.
1. Rewards for Maintaining Status Quo
Strategically, 100% commission plans make no provision for the difference between acquiring new business and maintaining the old business. It is always much easier to maintain old business than it is to acquire new business. As a result, if you are in the kind of business where your customers buy from you over and over again, the salesperson becomes unfairly compensated for maintaining the business,
and under-compensated for acquiring new business.
The net result? Your salesperson does what is easiest, and that is to call on the same customers and sell the same things, and your new account acquisition becomes a constant problem.
2. No Sales Productivity (or lack of motivation)
100% commission plans rarely offer an opportunity for the company to gain sales productivity. Again, I need to define my terms. Sales productivity is defined as the cost to acquire a certain amount of gross profit. If you pay the salesperson 15% of the gross profit, for example, your sales productivity will remain forever fixed at 15%. Your sales productivity will never
improve.
I don’t think that is an acceptable situation in any other aspect of your business. Aren’t you always trying to improve the productivity of your warehouse, for example? Aren’t you investing in new computer capability to improve the productivity of the customer service and data entry people? Aren’t you trying to become a leaner organization so that you improve the productivity of your
management?
In this kind of environment, why would you exempt one class of employees from the need to become more productive?